Source: patreon.com 8/30/26
This week on Registry Matters: we dig into how mandatory sex offense treatment has drifted from therapy into a profitable surveillance and revenue operation — a class you pay for that keeps you monitored. Then a North Carolina church takes its own sheriff to court over whether a registered person can sit in a pew on Sunday morning. And we break down how one missed 2019 appeal permanently locked a North Carolina registrant into a Tier 2 designation with no path to removal.
Read the full article and listen to the podcast
This is true. The “treatment” I was mandated to attend was nothing more than a probation officer disguised as a “therapist” who worked hand in hand with probation to violate people.
I’ve been putting “treatment” in quotes deliberately for the past few years on this and other boards for this very reason. And repeat that I was rocketed through my stupid “treatment” program by submitting formal ethics complaints against the providers with just about every civilian mental health organization they belonged to. Two polygraphs after those complaints were submitted (the results of which were comically predictable) and my “treatment” was completed.
I highly suggest others do the same, and would be more than happy to assist in doing so. But there is a risk of revocation, and accordingly understand that many won’t want to rock that boat.
Be careful…The gentlemen of this podcast publicly and openly criticize Janice and the things she has accomplished, make false statements as to what Janice has said in the past, and more, all without directly naming her, but clearly heavily imply who they are speaking of.
Also they disguise giving legal advice as offering “their opinions” into specific legal questions of persons, all while collecting “donations” of which higher level donors can have individual personal sessions with the main “guest”.
While individuals are entitled to offer personal opinions, they walk a fine line — if not cross it — between what’s legal and appropriate to do, and what’s not.
I would think if sex crimes have a high offense rate why not offer real treatment instead having a registry making life a million times harder. Been on the registry almost 13 years without a single crime committed. I can handle my own business as well as my ” urges”, yet I think it’s time for government’s bloated registry, prison industry machine, made up treatment, and your can’t get your mind out of registrants’ minds to piss off and pop.
I believe rigid statutes of limitations can be fundamentally unfair, particularly in serious sex-offense cases. The average person has no legal training and cannot reasonably be expected to understand complicated rules involving appeals, habeas corpus, evidentiary requirements, or procedural deadlines.
If credible evidence later emerges showing possible innocence, false reporting, exaggeration, investigative misconduct, or other serious errors, justice should not automatically be denied simply because a deadline has expired.
Finality is important, but truth and justice must ultimately be more important than procedural technicalities. If the United States prides itself on equal justice under the law, there should be a meaningful way to review credible evidence of a wrongful conviction or fundamental injustice—even when procedural deadlines would otherwise prevent it.
A statute of limitations should promote justice, not become an obstacle to discovering the truth.